The State’s Limited Role in Reconstruction and Its Submission to the Discourse of Inaction

Amid Lebanon’s worsening reconstruction crisis, a dominant discourse has emerged that justifies government paralysis through claims of fiscal incapacity, institutional decay, and a weakened banking sector, urging a “realistic” acceptance of the situation. Yet, this logic, rooted in the notion of state incapacity, ultimately reflects a retreat from public responsibility and a withdrawal from the state’s essential role. Today’s circumstances require a different approach, one that recognizes that accountability does not depend solely on financial resources but on the state’s ability to take initiative, provide direction, and adopt a clear stance. Strengthening official and military presence, particularly in the southern and border areas, is key to reasserting state responsibility in reconstruction.

In this context, it is crucial to look at how reconstruction efforts have progressed on the ground. Building on Public Works Studio’s monitoring of recovery efforts following the Israeli war on Lebanon, launched after the November 27, 2024 ceasefire, this article reviews key developments in reconstruction policies between July 15 and November 5, 2025.

After months of stagnation and a slow start to recovery, limited funds have begun to flow, mostly as small-scale loans covering only part of the actual needs. Nearly a year after the ceasefire, official action has amounted to a partial law passed in June 2025 granting exemptions to affected residents, without establishing a comprehensive recovery framework. While scattered initiatives have emerged across ministries, a national recovery strategy only recently took shape. Developed by the ministerial committee, it focuses on three tracks: displacement and housing, reconstruction, and socio-economic development, with an initial allocation of $500 million. Yet the strategy remains short-term, donor-dependent, and excludes environmental recovery and border village reconstruction, while sidelining affected communities from decision-making. In the absence of coordination and amid weak local financing, state efforts remain fragmented and delayed, exposing the lack of a coherent, long-term vision for reconstruction.

Read the full Article in Arabic.

Land Management and Planning Urban Governance Lebanon
 
 
 

The Exemptions and Reconstruction Law: Not an Alternative to a Comprehensive National Plan

More than seven months after the ceasefire in Lebanon, on June 30, 2025, the Parliament passed the first law related to reconstruction in response to the Israeli war on Lebanon. Ultimately, the law ...

MP Kassem Hashem proposes an amendment to the Reconstruction Law integrating the inclusion of persons with disabilities:

A positive step in need of follow-up and completion.

Following the Lebanese Union of People with Disabilities’ campaign, MP Kassem Hashem submitted a proposal to amend law No. 22 to integrate the rights of people with disabilities. Currently, it is crucial to ...

Between Rubble Removal and Reconstruction: Will the Israeli Ecocide in Lebanon Continue?

In the aftermath of Israel's attacks, Lebanon struggles with both physical and environmental destruction. This report examines the state's efforts in rubble removal, highlighting key gaps and necessary approaches for a sustainable recovery.

What Do We Know So Far About Post-War Recovery in Lebanon?

Public Works Studio has been monitoring and analyzing post-war recovery in Lebanon since the ceasefire on 27 November 2024, focusing on reconstruction policies, financing, compensation, rubble removal, projects, and displacement. The goal is ...

Parliament Approves Loan for Infrastructure Reconstruction:

Between Rapid Response and Delayed Comprehensive Reconstruction

The Lebanese Parliament approved a $250 million World Bank loan to implement the LEAP project, aimed at emergency reconstruction of damaged infrastructure, restoring essential services, and managing debris, as one of the three ...