Urbanism and Law: Master-planning in Lebanon and its Impact on People and Places

A review of the urban planning law in Lebanon underscores the absence of any mention of the concept of participation in master-planning, which reinforces the pure administrative and technocratic practice, and contributes to the proliferation of different forms of corruption, including favoritism and clientelism. On another level, exploring a database of all master plans issued by the Directorate General of Urban Planning from 1954 to date allowed us to draw lessons on the practice of planning. We drew a map of planned regions in Lebanon, and deducted that unplanned areas today in Lebanon account for 85% of the Lebanese territory. These are arbitrarily neglected, as they have several partial plans, and are subjected to a multitude of illegal decisions. We also drew a timeline of the areas that were planned for the first time. We found that there was a huge discrepancy between the activity of the DGU in planning areas before and after the Civil War. We also found that the National Lebanese Physical Masterplan was completely ignored, which allows for the misuse of authority on the local level.

Additionally, looked critically at land use maps in 15 cities and villages across Lebanon: Zgharta, Mina, Chekka, Hsoun, Kousba, Berbara, Zouk Mkayel, Dbayyeh, Damour, Debiyyeh, Baakline, Adloun, Abasiyye, Nabatiyye, Qana. In all these cases, we witnessed how factors such as law, property, identity and interests contributed to displacing people's imagination, social fabric, livelihoods, and sometime entire neighborhoods.